Resource 11 (Evaluation)

• This interactive website is written and supported by Larry Carley who is a well known automotive technical writer. Larry is an independent writer and because of this the information is non biased and based on giving accurate repair information regardless of what make of car or what brand diagnostic tools are used.
• There are a multitude of websites available that offer repair advice or information but this one is well laid out and simplified which makes it easy to locate specific information.
  
• The language and terms used in the website are suited to training because information is broken down into paragraphs as well as being often supported by diagrams and/or photos.
• The information is provided in various ways including a repair library, bulletins, links and a blog.
• This type of website would be suited for students to use in the workplace to assist with repairs which is extending or adding to their learning experiences. "The majority of students will be studying at least partly online in the future" (Hosie & schibeci, 2005, p. 883)
  
• This website would be very well suited to the unit AURE318866A - Repair electrical systems.
• The diagnostic information is well supported by links which is similar in principle to current paper based diagnostic charts that are used.
• The google search function used in the website incorporates both the website and Internet search actions which enables further options for students if required.
• In evaluating the information, it is very accurate and relevant to vehicles used in this country which is important when students are trying to relate new information to what they already know.
• The coverage or depth of the information provided is very well suited to learners of all levels as it covers basic information like voltage drop testing right through to current technologies of xenon lighting systems.
• I found it difficult to locate update dates on the website but most of the diagnostic principles or procedures listed don't age and are appropriate for many applications.

Evaluation

1* (poor), 5***** (Excellent)

1. Engagement of the resource. ***
   
2. Usability of the resource. ***
   
3. Depth/appropriateness of the resource. ***
   
4. Currency of the resource. ***
   
5. Consistency with current teaching models/practices. ***

Total: 15/25

References

Hosie, P., & Schibeci, R. (2005). Checklist and context-bound evaluations of online learning in higher education. British Journal of Educational Technology, 36(5), 881 - 895.